Available information regarding manpower and Distbins (Table-1)
S.No. |
TOWNS |
MANPOWER |
NUMBER OF DUSTBINS |
1. |
Kaemari |
449 |
76 |
2. |
SITE |
– |
200 |
3. |
Baldia |
292 |
586 |
4. |
Orangi |
51 |
187 |
5. |
Lyari |
173 |
210 |
6. |
Saddar |
155 |
108 |
7. |
Jamshed |
866 |
230 |
8. |
Gulshan-e-Iqbal |
– |
– |
9. |
Shah Faisal |
9 |
– |
10. |
Landhi |
89 |
– |
11. |
Korangi |
– |
– |
12. |
|
194 |
– |
13. |
New |
470 |
874 |
14. |
Gulberg |
25 |
24 |
15. |
Liaquatabad |
110 |
– |
16. |
Malir |
44 |
– |
17. |
Bin Qasim |
11 |
– |
18. |
Gadap |
272 |
– |
|
TOTAL |
4170 |
4085 |
GARBAGE GENERATION
PART I: EXISTING SITUATION
COMPOSITION OF WASTE
The types of wastes or garbage generated are: household, commercial, institutional and street sweepings. Sanitary workers sweep streets and provide a primary waste collection service.
Major markets where organic waste is generated are: Vegetable market: 100 tones per day (TPD) and Empress market: 70 TPD
High-income localities generate garbage:
Organic Waste: |
60% |
Garden Waste: |
12% |
Recyclable |
8% |
Low-income localities generate garbage: Garden Waste: maximum 5% Organic Waste: 40%
The composition of garbage generated in
Recyclable: 15%
Table 1: Composition of garbage generated in
Components of solid waste |
% |
Total Quantity Tons/day |
Recoverable Tons/day |
Rate Rs / Ton |
Amount Rs (mil) / day |
Amount Rs mil/yr |
Paper Metal Plastic Bone Glass Textile Bio Waste Others |
6.00 0.30 6.00 2.00 0.70 6.50 30.00 50.00 |
480 24 450 160 56 360 2400 4040 |
240 12 240 100 28 0 0 0 |
2000 24000 15000 6000 1000 0 0 0 |
0.48 0.288 3.60 0.60 0.028 0 0 0 |
175.2 105.12 1314.00 219.00 10.22 0 0 0 |
Total |
99.50 |
8000 |
520 |
11000 |
4996 |
1823.5 |
In addition to the above-mentioned amount, another few millions can be added from the sale of bones, leather, rubber, etc and composing of Bio-waste
Generation rate – per person
According to survey carried out in 1005: Waste generation rate: 300 grams/person/day
At another place the rate is given as:
It is also given that garbage generation ranges from 0.2 to
Also given is:
300 grams in document
Another approach is to have garbage generation rate per capita as:
Generation rate, g/person/day for: (1) Average and (2) low-mid-high income groups Then population has to be found for: (1) low-mid-high income groups and (2) total population
Population Data
The population data of
1 14 million
2 15.12 million ECIL, KMP team, 2006
3 15 million Jawed K, 2005
Population 14 million
Annual Population growth rate 4.5 %
Table 2 tentative Population Projections of Towns of
S.No. |
Towns |
Population in 1998 |
Unaccounted/ Adjusted (7%) |
Adjusted Population of 1998 |
Population Projection for 2005 at 5.00% AAGR. |
1 |
Keamari |
384,378 |
26,906 |
411,284 |
583,640 |
2 |
SITE |
467,560 |
32,729 |
500,289 |
709,944 |
3 |
Baldia |
406,165 |
28,432 |
434,597 |
616,722 |
4 |
Orangi |
723,694 |
50,659 |
774,353 |
1,098,859 |
5 |
Lyari |
607,992 |
42,559 |
650,551 |
923,176 |
6 |
Saddar |
607,992 |
43,131 |
659,282 |
935,565 |
7 |
Jamshed |
733,821 |
51,367 |
785,188 |
1,114,235 |
8 |
Gulshan-e-Iqbal |
625,230 |
43,766 |
668,996 |
949,351 |
9 |
Shah Faisal |
355,823 |
23,508 |
359,331 |
509,914 |
10 |
Landhi |
666,748 |
46,672 |
713,420 |
1,012,392 |
11 |
Korangi |
546,504 |
38,255 |
584,759 |
829,813 |
12 |
|
496,194 |
34,734 |
530,928 |
753,422 |
13 |
|
684,183 |
47,893 |
732,076 |
1,038,865 |
14 |
Gulberg |
453,490 |
31,744 |
485,234 |
688,580 |
15 |
Liaquatabad |
649,091 |
45,436 |
694,527 |
985,581 |
16 |
Malir |
398,289 |
27,880 |
426,169 |
604,763 |
17 |
Bin Qasim |
316,684 |
22,168 |
338,852 |
480,854 |
18 |
Gadap |
289,564 |
20,269 |
309,833 |
439,675 |
19 |
Cantonment |
306,165 |
21,432 |
427,597 |
464,882 |
20 |
Defence |
250,000 |
17,500 |
267,500 |
379,601 |
TOTAL (IN MILLION) |
9.96 |
0.70 |
10.65 |
15.12 |
Garbage generation rate – tons/day and tons/year
Total household waste generated: 4500
Total city lifting capacity: 1880 TPD/450 vehicle/ 3 trips Amount of Sold Waste Generated, (Present) 9000 tons/day
Number of Towns 18
Number of UCs 178
Average Solid Waste Generation / Town 400 tons/day Average Sold Waste Generation / UC 40 tons / day Solid Waste generation excluding industrial and Biological SW Based on 6113 TPD
6113 TPD
Generated / lifted |
SW Generated |
= |
6113 TPD |
6113 / 5057 TPD |
SW lifted |
= |
5157 TPD |
8000 TPD |
City Household Waste |
= |
4500 TPD |
7250 TPD |
|
|
|
2.70 TPD |
|
|
|
Table-3: Solid waste generation in
S. No. |
Town |
Garbage Generation per day in Tons |
Actual Lifting per day / ton |
Backlog per day |
1 |
Keamari |
220 |
180 |
40 |
2 |
SITE |
167 |
153 |
14 |
3 |
Baldia |
400 |
302 |
99 |
4 |
Orangi |
346 |
240 |
106 |
5 |
Lyari |
350 |
300 |
50 |
6 |
Saddar |
500 |
454 |
46 |
7 |
Jamshed |
330 |
525 |
78 |
8 |
Gulshan-e-Iqbal |
400 |
318 |
82 |
9 |
Shah Faisal |
105 |
105 |
– |
10 |
Landhi |
370 |
324 |
46 |
11 |
Korangi |
360 |
272 |
88 |
12 |
|
375 |
336 |
39 |
13 |
|
365 |
280 |
85 |
14 |
Gulberg |
330 |
330 |
0 |
15 |
Liaquatabad |
800 |
594 |
206 |
16 |
Malir |
280 |
270 |
10 |
17 |
Bin Qasim |
65 |
27 |
38 |
18 |
Gadap |
350 |
320 |
30 |
|
TOTAL |
6113 |
5057 |
1057 |
Source: SWM CDGK
Waste source-reduction and segregation
No information is available on this subject. It is unlikely that this activity is done here as a normal practice by wide section of the population in
There are three types of wastes: domestic, industrial and Hospital commercial Garden wastes.
Waste primarily falls into two categories: hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste (for municipal solid waste – MSW). Waste that does not fall into these two categories is called special or other waste.
The Waste Hierarchy
Waste hierarchy means classification, according to the facet of ‘desirability’, of waste management strategies. The strategies could be to reduce waste or to reuse recovery waste or inaheration to recycle waste, the ‘3 Rs’ of waste management. Another recent strategy is to ‘Re-think’ or review the present system for an improved system. Whatever the classification, the main and sole object of waste management is to treat and dispose waste completely or minimize if from the environment, to safeguard the health of the community.
Concurrently, the supplementary object is to extract maximum benefits from the waste by turning it in to a useful product.
COMPOSITION OF WASTE
In future, there will be increasing quantities of plastic, non-disposal waste and toxic waste in our households, which will require new and much more expensive ways of disposal. Waste generation industries, i.e. industries that make non-degradable products are a problem of SWM.
Waste type-quality: Use of urban waste could decline due to the contamination in it, particularly of plastics. Research to be conducted on the quality of waste as soil amendment, generation and on recovery and treatment of solid waste.
Take the case of
The composition of house waste (8% of total) is given in the figure below, which shows: Kitchen waste 17%, garden waste 21%, paper waste 18%, i.e., 56% of total.
Types of wastes
The various types of wastes, which are generated, are: ‘Municipal waste’ includes: household waste, street litter, municipal parks and gardens waste, offices waste and some commercial and industrial wastes. The originators, to separate ‘ recyclable or compositing’ wastes, sometimes sort out municipal waste. The remaining waste, called ‘residual waste’, is collected in special containers, provided by the local authority.
Table – Household waste
S.No. |
Type of waste |
Percent |
1 |
Kitchen waste |
17% |
2 |
Soil and other organics |
3% |
3 |
Fines |
3% |
4 |
Paper and board |
18% |
5 |
Dense plastic |
4% |
6 |
Plastic film |
3% |
7 |
Textiles |
3% |
8 |
Glass |
7% |
9 |
Wood |
5% |
10 |
Nappies |
2% |
11 |
Misc. non-combustibles |
5% |
12 |
Metal packaging |
3% |
13 |
Scrap metal /white goods |
5% |
14 |
Garden waste |
21% |
15 |
Other combusibles |
1% |
B. Population
The population projections are as follows:
EXISTING AND TENTATIVE POPULATION PROJECTION FOR THE TOWNS OF
(SCENARIO – D)
Declining Average Annual Growth Rate from 5.0% to 3.5% (Table-4)
S.No. |
Towns |
Population Projection for 2005 at 5.00% AAGR. |
Population Projection for 2010 at 4.5% AAGR. |
Population Projection for 2015 at 4.5% AAGR. |
Population Projection for 2020 at 3.50% AAGR |
1 |
Keamari |
583,640 |
730,905 |
892,730 |
1,063,461 |
2 |
SITE |
709,944 |
889,079 |
1,085,923 |
1,293,602 |
3 |
Baldia |
616,722 |
772,336 |
943,333 |
1,123,742 |
4 |
Orangi |
1,098,859 |
1,376,126 |
1,680,805 |
2,002,252 |
5 |
Lyari |
923,176 |
1,156,114 |
1,412,081 |
1,682,136 |
6 |
Saddar |
935,565 |
1,171,630 |
1,431,032 |
1,704,712 |
7 |
Jamshed |
1,114,235 |
1,395,382 |
1,704,323 |
2,030,268 |
8 |
Gulshan-e-Iqbal |
949,351 |
1,188,893 |
1,452,117 |
1,729,829 |
9 |
Shah Faisal |
509,914 |
638,578 |
779,961 |
929,126 |
10 |
Landhi |
1,012,392 |
1,267,840 |
1,548,544 |
1,844,697 |
11 |
Korangi |
829,813 |
1,039,193 |
1,269,273 |
1,512,017 |
12 |
|
753,422 |
943,528 |
1,152,428 |
1,372,826 |
13 |
|
1,038,865 |
1,300,995 |
1,589,038 |
1,892,936 |
14 |
Gulberg |
688,580 |
862,324 |
1,053,245 |
1,254,674 |
15 |
Liaquatabad |
985,581 |
1,234,265 |
1,507,535 |
1,795,845 |
16 |
Malir |
604,763 |
757,358 |
925,039 |
1,101,949 |
17 |
Bin Qasim |
480,854 |
602,184 |
735,509 |
876,173 |
18 |
Gadap |
439,675 |
550,614 |
672,521 |
801,138 |
19 |
Cantonment |
464,882 |
582,183 |
711,079 |
847,071 |
20 |
Defence |
379,601 |
475,382 |
580,633 |
691,766 |
TOTAL (IN MILLION) |
15.12 |
18.93 |
23.13 |
27.55 |
C. Waste generation rates GPD/person, TPD/zone & TPY/zone
Waste type – Quantity: Waste generation is related with consumption and consumption is related with income. Rural consumers consume less so lesser waste is generated than urban consumers.
Composition of solid waste and generation is shown in this report.
Solid Waste generation is calculated on the basis of population projection.
1. Declining Average Annual growth rate scenario – D
2. Estimate gross population capacity
3. combination of annual growth rate and gross population capacity for the new towns.
Amount of waste
Solid Waste Management and Disposal has been design on the basis of population projection option – II AS shown in this report however the calculation are shown of all the three options for comparison purpose.
In advance countries the amount of waste generated is enormous. We cannot emulate them because of our backwardness. But, it is useful to know a bit about how their waste is dealt with. We could try to establish basic systems, as in advance countries, for our future generations to come.
Take the case of
Garbage collection
PART I EXISTING SITUATION
The population of
Town Municipal Administration (TMA): 18 Union Councils (UCs): 178
City District Government
Sindh Industrial Trading Estate: 1 Export Processing Zone: 1
A. Garbage collection services
In
(refer Table 2)
estimated garbage collected: 5057 TPD (tons per day) estimated garbage not collected: 1057 TPD
• Annual Expenditure Rs 800 million
• Lifting Capacity 50% In each Town and UC,
B. Garbage collection – primary collection
One stage collection
Primary stage collection of garbage is from house hold to dust bin sites, (‘kachra kundi’).
This is done in the following ways:
Garbage is collected in stages, which ultimately lead to its collection at one point for a fixed zone. From this point, garbage is disposed to landfill sites. But this may not be case for all cities. For instance, in
Stage 1: From house → resident travels to dispose garbage → to dust bins
Stage 2: From dust bins → municipality vehicles dispose of garbage → to landfill sites OR → to unofficial dumping ground (Primary transportation, 2-3 trips a day, long trips)
This is the most uneconomical way of SWM because the distance to landfill site is long and several vehicles have to make this long trips several times a day. Considering the large amount of waste and the cost of fuel and O&M, not all waste is disposed of.
Table 2: Details of garbage collection
The following problems arise in
Gradual decrease in number of dust bins, as a large number of garbage containers
(Katchra Kundi) are in the workshop for repairs.
Haphazard accumulation of garbage on streets, in open spaces and in drains.
Primary stage collection, from house hold to dust bin sites, involves the following problems:
It may be mentioned that the uncollected waste usually finds it way in sewers, is eaten by the cattle, or left to rot in the open, or burnt on roadsides. These are harmful practices.
Two stage collection Garbage collection-record
Garbage collection equipment Vehicles 550
Garbage collection manpower Staff 15188
Poor attendance of sanitary workers. Privatized transport system
Benefits of privatization:
Regarding a successful contract in
to the landfill. There was no intervention of labor unions. Prompt redresses of public complaints were undertaken.
Short Comings:
The tonnage rate of Rs 269 /ton is on the higher side as compared to some of the other TMAs. The contractor dumped garbage at undesignated and un-monitored landfill sites.
TMA, Gulshan-e-Iqbal awarded a contract in 2006 for transportation of garbage from a temporary garbage transfer station to landfill site. This contract is still in force.
HOSPITAL WASTE MANAGEMENT
For hospitals:
Generation rate is : 3 to
900 beds at one place it is given 900. At another place, total beds =
Hospital waste:
The handling of hospital waste, or ‘Bio-Medical Waste;, has assumed importance because of spreading such dangerous disease as AIDS. On way to manage this important issue is to make the hospital personnel aware of the dangers and the need for seriously taking the management of this waste for safe handling and disposal. Internet could be used very effectively for this purpose. A web site could be established to disseminate information for the doctors and hospital staff to read it at any time at their convenience.
2. HOSPITAL WASTE
Ref. CDGK SWM Expert, “Presentation on
Total no. of hospitals in
Total no. of beds 900
Waste generation rate of hospital 3
Non hazardous waste component
The table-1 below gives the details of HCUs.
Only 140 HCU dispose off their waste through incineration plants run by City Government (CG). The remaining HCU dispose off their waste along with the municipal waste. This poses a health hazard.
The reasons of health hazards are –a- Non-registration of HCUs either with Health Department Government of Sindh or with City Govt. and –b- Non-presence of Environment Protection Agency of Sindh at grassroot level.
Incinerators
The CD installed two incineration plants at Mewa Shah in 1996. Each has a capacity of
A contractor, M/s Abaseen International, operates both the plants for 2 years. Their responsibilities include collection of waste from hospital and clinics, transport and incinerate the waste, operate and maintain the plants. They are running only at 12- 15% capacity due to non-registration of all HCUs.
Service charges for incineration and transportation are collected from registered HCUs and deposited in the CG account. Services charges component of 22.2% is retained by CG and the balance is paid to the contractor. The table-2 below gives the services charges rates.
Table-1: HCU details in Karachi Towns – 2006
S.No. |
Towns |
No. of HCU (3) |
No. of Hospitals (4) |
No. of Beds |
Total 3&4 |
1 |
Keamari |
184 |
27 |
0 |
211 |
3 |
Baldia |
0 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
4 |
Orangi |
211 |
9 |
167 |
220 |
7 |
Jamshed |
256 |
26 |
564 |
282 |
10 |
Landhi |
14 |
0 |
10 |
14 |
11 |
Korangi |
71 |
10 |
540 |
81 |
13 |
|
54 |
15 |
260 |
69 |
14 |
Gulberg |
66 |
20 |
507 |
86 |
15 |
Liaquatabad |
10 |
4 |
850 |
14 |
16 |
Malir |
110 |
17 |
502 |
127 |
17 |
Bin Qasim |
39 |
01 |
50 |
40 |
18 |
Gadap |
79 |
10 |
917 |
89 |
TOTAL |
1094 |
143 |
4367 |
1237 |
Comments are closed